Drawing for PRESIDEO

USPTO serial 76051309

PRESIDEO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRESIDEO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Virginia L. Carron

VIRGINIA L CARRON FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED TO SECURE ENTRY TO VARIOUS SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS USING BIOMETRIC TECHNOLOGY TO AUTHENTICATE USERS IDENTITY AND ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY CORPORATE WEB SITES, CORPORATE INTRANETS, PORTALS, CONTENT PROVIDERS AND APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDERS IN THE FIELDS OF HEALTHCARE SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS, HEALTHCARE SERVICES AND ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGEACTIVE
016PRINTED ADVERTISING MATERIALS, NAMELY BROCHURES, TRADE JOURNALS AND BOOKLETS IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION SECURITY AND NETWORK AND INTERNET SECURITY INFRASTRUCTURE, PRINTED INSTRUCTIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS, USERS MANUALS AND BUSINESS FORMS IN THE INFORMATION AND NETWORK AND INTERNET SECURITY FIELDSACTIVE
035BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS E-COMMERCE SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING INFORMATION TO TECHNOLOGY FOR AUTHENTICATING USERS IDENTITY VIA AN ON-LINE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE
042COMPUTER MONITORING, VERIFICATION AND IDENTIFICATION SERVICES FOR PROVIDING ACCESS TO VARIOUS SOFTWARE APPLICATION USING BIOMETRIC TECHNOLOGY TO AUTHENTICATE USERS IDENTITY VIA AN ON-LINE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 27, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 4, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 15, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 20, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 15, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 18, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Oct 18, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Oct 9, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 9, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Oct 4, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 15, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance