USPTO serial 76051954
VIPSTAYUSA.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIPSTAYUSA.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherri L. Rohlf
SHERRI L ROHLF SIEGEL, BRILL, GREUPNER, DUFFY & FOSTER1300 WASHINGTON SQ100 WASHINGTON AVEMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services and on-line retail store services featuring convenience stores items and general consumer goods, department store services, computerized on-line ordering services and on-line wholesale distributorship featuring general consumer goods; dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line electronic communications network; providing an on-line computer database in the field of business to business guidance for merchandise and services; shoppers' guide information; computerized database aggregation, integration and management services for others; on-line trading services in which sellers post items to be auctioned and buyers bid on such items electronically; providing classified advertising for others via the global computer information network; promoting hotel, airline, car rental and time share services by means of an incentive award program; promoting the goods and services of others through a consumer loyalty program offering rewards, namely, a frequent traveler program as an incentive for repeat and regular customers; club membership association services, namely discount buying club membership services featuring general consumer goods and services by means of live events, mailed information, and product reviews on-line directory of services to help locate people, places, organizations, land and wireless phone numbers, network home pages, and electronic mail addresses, electronic auctioning services via computer; auctioneering; providing information in the fields of recruitment, employment, employment advertising, employment related issues, management related issues, payroll processing careers, lifestyle, resume creations, resume transmittal and response thereto and resume matching services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |