USPTO serial 76052088
SAMMY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAMMY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART NICHOLSON GRAHAM599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING TEMPORARY HOUSING ACCOMMODATIONS; HOTELS; LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, NAMELY, LICENSING PORTRAIT RIGHTS, STAGE NAMES FOR PUBLIC ENTERTAINERS, COPYRIGHTS AND PHOTOGRAPHY; SECURITY GUARD SERVICES, NAMELY, GUARDING FACILITIES AND PERSONAL BODYGUARDING, RENTAL OF UNIFORMS FOR BODYGUARDING, RENTAL OF COMPUTERS, NAMELY, CENTRAL PROCESSING UNITS, PROGRAMMED-DATA-CARRYING ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS, MAGNETIC DISKS, MAGNETIC TAPES, OPTICAL MAGNETIC DISK, CD-ROMS AND PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT FOR COMPUTERS, BEAUTY SALONS AND HAIRDRESSING SALONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |