USPTO serial 76052147
E GENTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 20, 2005
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with E GENTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
50250 Kuala Lumpur, MY
50250 Kuala Lumpur, MY
50250 Kuala Lumpur, MY
GENTING INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
DOUGLAS, IM
Other trademarks owned by GENTING INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer A. Lazo
Jennifer A. Lazo BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10112-4498UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | development of computer hardware, software and applications for others; making reservations and bookings for hotels and temporary lodging | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by E-Genting Holdings Sdn Bhd
- Other trademarks owned by E-Genting Holdings Sdn Bhd
- Other trademarks owned by E-Genting Holdings Sdn Bhd
- Other trademarks owned by GENTING INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named E GENTING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 14, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 13, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |