USPTO serial 76052218
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
D-22525 Hamburg, DE
D-22525 Hamburg, DE
D-22525 Hamburg, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific apparatus and instruments for the manipulation, separation and analysis of synthetic and biological particles, namely, micro electrode devices, lab-on-the- chip devices and dielectrophoretic field effect chips; pipetting and dispensing devices; micro mounting devices; microfluidic systems, in the form of microchannels and microcompartments, optical instruments, namely, microscopes and microscope-based detectors; luminometers; fluorometers; photodiodes or CCD chips; for research and industrial use in the fields of biotechnology, chemistry, pharmacology, and diagnostics; prerecorded magnetic data carriers containing computer programs for use to collect and evaluate experimental data in the field of biotechnology, pharmacology, medicine, diagnostics and chemistry and instructions sold as a unit | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Retail distributorships featuring biotechnological, pharmaceutical and diagnostic products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of biotechnological, pharmaceutical and diagnostic products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Research and development services for others, namely, analysis and/or separation of synthetic and biological particles, development and research of products and/or methods in the field of biotechnology, pharmacology, medicine, diagnostics and chemistry; computer software design for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 23, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 20, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |