Drawing for TRANSPACIFIC AIRLINES

USPTO serial 76052473

TRANSPACIFIC AIRLINES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FISHER, LATONIA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TRANSPACIFIC AIRLINES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles P. LaPolla

CHARLES P LAPOLLA OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN, LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039PASSENGER AND CARGO AIR TRANSPORTATION SERVICESACTIVEMar 17, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 4, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2005CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 10, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 8, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 11, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
May 10, 2004PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
May 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 9, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 9, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 9, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 20, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 9, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 15, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 9, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 27, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance