USPTO serial 76052473
TRANSPACIFIC AIRLINES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, LATONIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRANSPACIFIC AIRLINES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles P. LaPolla
CHARLES P LAPOLLA OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN, LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | PASSENGER AND CARGO AIR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES | ACTIVE | Mar 17, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Airline Partner Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Airline Partner Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named TRANSPACIFIC AIRLINES
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |