USPTO serial 76052661
BRIX 1000
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2920997Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 25, 2005
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BRIX 1000?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIMON LEMAY
SIMON LEMAY LAVERY de BILLY925 GRANDE ALLEE WESTSUITE 500QUEBEC CITY, G1S 1C1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and hardware for measuring and reporting the quality and performance metrics associated with network-based services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |