USPTO serial 76052675
KABLOOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KABLOOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Mark Dickison
J MARK DICKISON LAWSON & WEITZEN LLPSTE 34588 BLACK FALCON AVEBOSTON, MA 02210Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Candy, including mints, chocolate, truffles, and chocolate covered nuts | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 16, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 13, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |