USPTO serial 76053000
GOLF CHIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOLF CHIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | On-line retail services featuring sporting goods, clothing and accessories and multi media products; talent agency services; personal management consultation and financial management of professional athletes; sports marketing and public relations; promotion of sports competitions and events of others; arranging for sponsors to affiliate their goods and services with a wide variety of sporting competitions and events | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing on-line information relating to sports, fitness, travel and adventure via a global computer information network; travel agency services; television and radio programming services; encoding, transmitting and receiving of pictures, video, text, and/or audio over local and global networks; on-line sports magazine; on-line retail services featuring sporting goods, clothing and accessories and multi media products; production of video programs for transmission over television and global computer networks; arranging and conducting athletic competitions; organizing athletic events and exhibitions of others | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |