USPTO serial 76053001
GOLF CHIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOLF CHIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software recorded on optical disks, magnetic disks, cassettes, tapes, CD-ROMs, video tapes and video disks featuring a variety of sporting competitions, events, and exhibitions; software for use in training and coaching and manuals sold therewith; software for use in multimedia entertainment featuring travel, adventure, sports, and women's lifestyles | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Publications, namely, magazines, syndicated columns in magazines, and newsletters featuring sporting competitions, sporting events, sporting exhibitions, competitive sports, travel, adventure, and women's lifestyles | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |