USPTO serial 76053102
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Kansas City, MO
Kansas City, MO
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Malcolm A. Litman
MALCOLM A LITMAN LITMAN, KRAAI & BROWN, LLC4700 BELLEVIEWSTE 200KANSAS CITY, MO 64112| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business and marketing consulting, and business and marketing consulting via video-conferencing, and via local or global computer network, in the fields of education, training, business innovation, leadership, management, risk, strategic planning, communications, organizational systems, operational systems, information systems, work safety, productivity, office culture, motivation, business strategy and sales | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |