USPTO serial 76054022
XUMA CONTROLX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XUMA CONTROLX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan P. Gibbs
SUSAN P GIBBS PILLSBURY MADISON & SUTRO LLP1100 NEW YORK AVE NW NINTH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3918UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business services, namely, administration services, marketing consulting, advertising, design, database management, auction services, and electronic retailing services for others | ACTIVE | Mar 13, 2000 |
| 042 | computer services, namely, website development; development of computer software in the field of creating and maintaining commercial web sites for retailers; providing maintenance, troubleshooting and upgrades for such software; database performance analysis; website performance analysis; computer consulting in the field of online commerce; web hosting services; systems integration; data backup and restoration; and application hosting services | ACTIVE | Mar 13, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |