USPTO serial 76054442
MICKETY-MITCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICKETY-MITCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SANDRA EDELMAN
SANDRA EDELMAN DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP15TH FL250 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10177Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS; PRERECORDED RECORDS, AUDIO CASSETTES, COMPACT DISCS AND CD-ROMS FEATURING MUSIC AND LYRICS; PRERECORDED VIDEO TAPES FEATURING MUSICAL ENTERTAINMENT; LASER DISCS FEATURING MUSICAL ENTERTAINMENT; VIDEO DISCS FEATURING MUSICAL ENTERTAINMENT; MULTIMEDIA SOFTWARE RECORDED ON CD-ROM FEATURING MUSICAL ENTERTAINMENT; ELECTRONIC DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA FEATURING MP3 DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY FORMATS, NAMELY, MUSICAL DATA IN DIGITAL FORM DOWNLOADED FROM A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND RECORDED ON MAGNETIC MEDIA | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS AND AUDIO VISUAL RECORDINGS; ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF LIVE PERFORMANCES BY A MUSICAL PERFORMER; PROVIDING LIVE AND/OR PRERECORDED MUSIC, MUSIC CONCERTS, MUSIC VIDEOS AND MUSIC VIDEO CLIPS BY MEANS OF COMPUTER DATABASES AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS FEATURING MP3 DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY FORMATS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 25, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |