USPTO serial 76054708
HIT HIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HIT HIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda G. Alvarez
TRADEMARK DOCKET LINDA G ALVAREZWILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI PC650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | DESIGNING COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, PROGRAMMING AND INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, DATABASES, AND WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SERVICES FOR MANAGEMENT OF ELECTRONIC ASSETS, NAMELY, MANAGING, TRACKING AND ANALYZING FOR OTHERS USER ACCESS TO PICTURES, VIDEO, TEXT AND AUDIO VIA ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; HOSTING THE WEB SITES AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS OF OTHERS ON COMPUTER SERVERS ACCESSIBLE VIA ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS | ACTIVE | Apr 10, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |