Drawing for 1-800-PET DOCS

USPTO serial 76054955

1-800-PET DOCS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, ROBERT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 1-800-PET DOCS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott W. Petersen

SCOTT W PETERSEN HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLC131 S DEARBORN 30TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042VETERINARY SERVICESACTIVEApr 10, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 27, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 27, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 6, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 18, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 15, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 21, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 22, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance