USPTO serial 76054967
VIKING NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIKING NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
123 86 Farsta, SE
123-86 Farsta, SE
123-86 Farsta, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Maintenance services, namely fault-tracing in technically complicated electronic telecommunication and data telecommunication equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TRANSMISSION OF TELECOMMUNICATION AND DATA COMMUNICATION VIA BROADBAND COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND PICTURES VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS; PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF DATA COMMUNICATION AND TELECOMMUNICATION; TRANSMISSION OF TELECOMMUNICATION SIGNALS AND DATA COMMUNICATION SIGNALS VIA TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS AND DATA COMMUNICATION NETWORKS; DATA, MESSAGE AND PICTURE COMMUNICATION VIA FIBRE-OPTICAL NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DATA COMMUNICATION AND TELECOMMUNICATION CONSULTING SERVICES; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS IN CONNECTION WITH INSTALLATION OF TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS; COMPUTER PROGRAMING FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TELIA AB
- Other trademarks owned by TELIASONERA AB
- Other trademarks owned by TELIASONERA AB
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VIKING NETWORK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |