USPTO serial 76055096
WAVESET TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WAVESET TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH G ADAMS
JOSEPH G ADAMS WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATIPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for controlling and monitoring access to and providing security for electronic computer information networks used for sharing of corporate processes applications, and data among business partners, and manuals packaged as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely controlling and monitoring access to and providing security for corporate processes, applications, and data among business partners operating over an electronic computer information network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Etegrity, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by WAVESET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WAVESET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WAVESET TECHNOLOGIES
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |