USPTO serial 76055200
TURTLE DIRT TRAPPER MAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TURTLE DIRT TRAPPER MAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kingston, Surrey KT2 5HT, GB
Kingston, Surrey KT2 5HT, GB
Kingston, Surrey KT2 5HT, GB
Kingston, Surrey KT2 5HT, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | Carpets, rugs, floor mats, and matting for covering existing floors; floor mats and machine washable long pile cotton and cotton/polyester mix floor mats for use in homes, shops, offices, factories, agricultural buildings, farm buildings, horticultural buildings, boats, ships, cars, vehicles, caravans and mobile homes, motor homes, public transport vehicles, airplanes, trains, all for trapping dirt | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Turtle, James Hersey
- Other trademarks owned by Turtle, Carole Lenore
- Other trademarks owned by Turtle, Carole Lenore
- Other trademarks owned by Turtle, James Hersey
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named TURTLE DIRT TRAPPER MAT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2024 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2024 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |