Drawing for MEDICALOFFICEPORTAL

USPTO serial 76055511

MEDICALOFFICEPORTAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSLICK, SCOTT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDICALOFFICEPORTAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SANDRA M. KOENIG

SANDRA M KOENIG FAY, SHARPE, FAGAN, MINNICH & MCKEE LLP1100 SUPERIOR AVE 7TH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042MEDICAL PRACTICE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, REGISTRATION AND CHARGE POSTING, PATIENT BILLING, ON-ACCOUNT PAYMENT POSTING, DELINQUENT ACCOUNT COLLECTION, PATIENT RELATIONS, APPOINTMENT SCHEDULING AND PRACTICE MANAGEMENT REPORTING, ALL VIA A COMPUTERIZED NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 1, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2004ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Mar 19, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance