USPTO serial 76055565
BIOCEUTIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIOCEUTIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHELLE D. KAHN
MICHELLE D KAHN SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLPFOUR EMBARCADERO CTR 17TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4106UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Skin care services in the nature of day spa services, skin care salons and clinics and facials | ACTIVE | Aug 3, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 4, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |