USPTO serial 76055812
L'EBIZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2995451Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2005
- Examiner
- THOMPKINS, TRICIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with L'EBIZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eugene J. A. Gierczak
Eugene J. A. Gierczak MILLER THOMSON LLP40 King Street West, Suite 5800TORONTO, Ontario, M5H3S1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTATION, NAMELY, CONSULTING IN THE FIELD OF TECHNOLOGY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES RELATED TO E-COMMERCE, SPECIFICALLY IN THE AREAS OF ENTERPRISE WIDE DEPLOYMENT OF E-COMMERCE STRATEGIES FOR MANAGING DEMAND, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURING, PURCHASING, TRANSPORTATION, LOGISTICS, AND STATISTICAL AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF BUSINESS STRATEGIES AND DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF E-COMMERCE BUSINESS STRATEGIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF TECHNOLOGY FOR USE IN BUSINESS PROCESSES, SPECIFICALLY FOR ENTERPRISE WIDE DEPLOYMENT OF E-COMMERCE STRATEGIES FOR MANAGING DEMAND, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURING, PURCHASING, TRANSPORTATION, LOGISTIC AND STATISTICAL AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATION CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LOGITEK TECHNOLOGY LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by LOGITEK TECHNOLOGY LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by LOGITEK TECHNOLOGY LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named L'EBIZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 30, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |