USPTO serial 76056032
ESSENSUALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPKINS, TRICIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ESSENSUALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Carstens
DAVID W CARSTENS CARSTENS YEE & CAHOON, LLPP O BOX 802334DALLAS, TX 75380UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | SALON SERVICES, NAMELY, BEAUTY TREATMENTS, HAIRDRESSING, SKIN CARE AND TANNING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |