Drawing for HOMEGAIN

USPTO serial 76056120

HOMEGAIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOMEGAIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KAREN MARIE KITTERMAN

KAREN MARIE KITTERMAN FENWICK & W LLPSILICON VALLEY CTR801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for use in controlling computer hardware resources and providing utilities, pre-recorded video cassettes, audio-cassettes and compact discs all featuring information about the purchase, sale, exchange, financing, rental, improvement, maintenance and inspection of real property; CD-ROMS and DVDs featuring graphical images, text, pictures, sound, digital information, media and a combination thereof; all for use in the fields of real estate, moving, insurance, financial, construction, real or personal property management, maintenance, improvement, interior design and interior decorating, gardening, landscaping and landscape design, architectural design, public utility, web site development, web site hostingACTIVE—
036providing financial valuation of personal property; leasing of real estate; real estate brokerage; real estate investment; real estate management; real estate time-sharing; real estate trustee services; real estate escrow services, insurance services, namely, providing residential, escrow, title insuranceACTIVE—
041Electronic publishing services, namely publishing the text, graphic images, pictures, sound, digital information and combinations thereof of others on web sites on global computer networks, CD-ROMs and DVDs in the field of real estate, moving, insurance, financial, construction, real or personal property management, maintenance, improvement, interior design and interior decorating, gardening, landscaping and landscaping design, architectural design, public utility; web site development, web site hostingACTIVE—
042Rental of computer software; computer services, namely, software consultation; providing Web site development and hosting services; providing consultation in the field of website development and hostingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 8, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 8, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 17, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 16, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 9, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 9, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 9, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 29, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 25, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 11, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 20, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 18, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 24, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 21, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 21, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 3, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance