USPTO serial 76056639
SHEENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IN, SUNG HYUN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHEENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn S Fruchter
LYNN S FRUCHTER COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | ACTION FIGURES; BATTERY OPERATED TOY FIGURES, TOY ROBOTS AND TOY VEHICLES, BOARD AND CARD GAMES, TOY MODEL VEHICLES AND RELATED ACCESSORIES SOLD AS UNITS, MODELING CLAY SETS FOR CHILDREN, COSTUME MASKS, DART GAMES SETS, DIE CAST VEHICLES, namely, ROCKETS AND SPACE SHIPS AND TOY LAND VEHICLES, DOLL TRUNKS AND CASES, DOLLS, EDUCATIONAL TOYS, NAMELY, ROLE PLAYING GAMES AND PROBLEM SOLVING GAMES AND ACTIVITY SETS CONSISTING OF MAZES, SHAPE PUZZLES AND MATCHING SETS; KITES, TOY WIND SOCKS, TOY MODEL HOBBYCRAFT KITS, MUSICAL TOYS AND TOY INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, GUITARS, UKULELES, TRUMPETS, AND DRUMS, PLAYSETS FOR DOLLS AND ACTION FIGURES, PLUSH TOYS, PRE-SCHOOL PLAYSETS CONSISTING OF MINIATURE PLAY HOUSES AND SHAPE PIECES; PUPPETS, JIGSAW PUZZLES, RADIO CONTROLLED TOY VEHICLES, HANDHELD UNIT FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC AND/OR VIDEO GAMES, ROLE PLAYING GAMES, CONSTRUCTION TOYS, ACTIVITY SETS CONTAINING BUILDING BLOCKS, CRYSTALS AND PEGS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2012 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 27, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 27, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |