USPTO serial 76057080
UNITEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNITEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart L. Gitler
STEWART L GITLER HOFFMAN, WASSON & GITLER, PC2361 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYSTE 522ARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE, COMPACT DISCS, AND VIDEO DISCS FEATURING INSTRUCTIONS AT THE COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY LEVEL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UNIVERSIDAD TECNOLOGICA DE MEXICO, S.C.
- Other trademarks owned by UNIVERSIDAD TECNOLOGICA DE MEXICO, S.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named UNITEC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |