Drawing for YELLOW BUS

USPTO serial 76057161

YELLOW BUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, LESLIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YELLOW BUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GLENN S BACAL

GLENN S BACAL QUARLES & BRADY STREICH LANG LLP1 RENAISSANCE2 N CENTRAL AVEPHOENIX, AZ 85004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Publication of publicity texts; publication of advertising materials for others, namely, advertising brochures and leaflets; and providing an on-line computer database in the fields of business and advertisingACTIVE—
041publication of books, magazines and journals; publication of printed photographs, art photographs, art pictures or art prints in the form of books, brochures, booklets, leaflets, and magazines; conducting classes, seminars, conferences and workshops in the field of education for children, parents and families via the global information network; entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games; entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring a non-downloadable interactive multimedia game and entertainment, namely continuing variety, news, comedy and cartoon shows, motion pictures, and musical performances distributed over television, satellite, audio and video media; and providing a website featuring children's quizzes, pictures, cartoons and stories for education purposes; providing an on-line computer database in the fields of sports, games, and musicACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 15, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 25, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 19, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance