Drawing for CRATE&BARRELKIDS

USPTO serial 76057453

CRATE&BARRELKIDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRATE&BARRELKIDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael G. Kelber

Michael G. Kelber Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLPTwo North LaSalle Street, Suite 1700c/o Trademark AdministratorChicago, IL 60602

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035RETAIL STORE, MAIL ORDER AND INTERNET RETAIL SERVICES FEATURING HOUSEWARES, FURNITURE, TABLEWARE, TOYS, GIFT ITEMS AND CLOTHING, ALL DIRECTED TOWARDS CHILDRENACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 20, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 6, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 28, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 20, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 6, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 8, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 13, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 29, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance