USPTO serial 76057624
ARENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Teneriffe, QLD 4005, AU
Teneriffe, QLD 4005, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia Smith
CYNTHIA SMITH GORSUCH KIRGIS1515 ARAPAHOE, TWR 1, STE 1000DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | design and writing of computer software products for others; technical advice and support, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems in-person and via telephone, both in the field of computer software products; technical consultation, namely, specializing in the management of assets, business process and logistics for capital intensive industries including mining, utilities, transportation and government; technical support for computer systems, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems in-person and via telephone, and technical management of computer systems used for the provision of fully web-enabled interface and support for collaborative and e-business processes; computer systems integration; computer software maintenance, customization and implementation; leasing computer software for use by third parties; software application hosting and integration services for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2006 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 25, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |