USPTO serial 76057828
EGG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EGG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London SWIX 8ES, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean Ploen
SEAN PLOEN TESTA HURWITZ & THIBEAULT LLPHIGH ST TWR125 HIGH STBOSTON, MA 02110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Clothing design services; jewelry, belts and fashion handbags, purses, hair ornaments, watches, and sunglasses design services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |