Drawing for INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THE DIGITAL ECONOMY

USPTO serial 76058027

INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THE DIGITAL ECONOMY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THE DIGITAL ECONOMY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sheldon H. Klein

SHELDON H KLEIN ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; MANAGING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; HOSTING THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; SERVER CO-LOCATION SERVICES, NAMELY, LEASING OF FACILITIES FOR THE USE OF COMPUTERS BY OTHERS AND FOR PROVIDING A CONNECTION TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING NETWORK WEB PAGES FOR OTHERS; SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION OF INTERNAL, EXTRANET AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK SERVERS FOR OTHERS; DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, PROGRAMMING, IMPLEMENTATION AND SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMPUTER NETWORKS AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS OF OTHERS; DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, PROGRAMMING, IMPLEMENTATION AND SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMPUTER SYSTEMS OF OTHERS, NAMELY, COMPUTER SYSTEMS THAT CONNECT TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND OTHER COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATION NETWORKS; COMPUTER DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING SERVICES; PROVIDING COMPUTER DISASTER RECOVERY SERVICES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK TRAFFIC SERVICES, NAMELY, DISTRIBUTING WEB TRAFFIC BETWEEN MULTIPLE WEBSITES; COMPUTER NETWORK SECURITY SERVICES; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF WEB SITE PERFORMANCE; COMPUTER DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES, NAMELY, TESTING OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS, HARDWARE AND COMPUTER NETWORKS FOR OTHERS; CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTER NETWORKS, AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS DESIGNACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance