USPTO serial 76058064
DELICIOUSLY DEVILISH RED BREW HOOPERS HOOCH "EXTREME REFRESHMENT" MALT BEVERAGE WITH NATURAL FLAVORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEJESUS, YSA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DELICIOUSLY DEVILISH RED BREW HOOPERS HOOCH "EXTREME REFRESHMENT" MALT BEVERAGE WITH NATURAL FLAVORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEWIS D HANSEN
LEWIS D HANSEN SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5141UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | SPARKLING ALCOHOLIC MALT LIQUOR; BREWED ALCOHOLIC MALT LIQUOR; FLAVORED BEER, NAMELY, ALCOHOLIC BERRY BREW; BEER; STOUT; LAGER; PORTER; ALE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BRANDBREW S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Bass Machine Holdings Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Bass Machine Holdings Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named DELICIOUSLY DEVILISH RED BREW HOOPERS HOOCH "EXTREME REFRESHMENT" MALT BEVERAGE WITH NATURAL FLAVORS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |