Drawing for BELIEVE

USPTO serial 76058480

BELIEVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BELIEVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roy S. Gordet

ROY S GORDET ROY S GORDET, ATTORNEY AT LAWSTE 60198 BATTERY STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009house mark electronic systems consisting of computer hardware, software and related components and peripherals for use in the fields of image processing, computer graphics and video; a house mark for computer and video gamesACTIVE—
038house mark for the electronic transmission of data, 2D and 3D animation, video and computer generated images over a global computer information network and other computer networksACTIVE—
041house mark for entertainment services, namely, the creation, production and distribution of computer animation, motion pictures, film, television programs and videotapesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 14, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 16, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 14, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 14, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 13, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance