Drawing for COSTCAPPER

USPTO serial 76058565

COSTCAPPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COSTCAPPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Caroline R. Clark

CAROLINE R CLARK WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP767 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10153UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, computer software development tools, and communications software which together allow users to offer their customers electronic access to news, financial data, and account information and the capacity to perform electronic business transactions in the fields of personal and professional finance, investment, and insurance, all provided through area networks or a global computer networkACTIVE—
035Promoting the goods and services of others in the fields of personal and professional finance, investment, and insurance by allowing others to place advertisements in an electronic database accessible through area networks or a global computer networkACTIVE—
036Providing news, information, and data in the fields of personal and professional finance, and investment via an interactive computer database; providing stock exchange quotations, financial and stock market information services, investment instrument information services, and general information services in the fields of personal and professional finance, investment, and insurance, all provided through area networks or a global computer networkACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, maintenance of computer software, and creating, hosting, and maintaining websites for others; news agency services, namely, gathering and dissemination of newsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 13, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance