Drawing for APPLIED TECH PRODUCTS

USPTO serial 76058815

APPLIED TECH PRODUCTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2664739Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 17, 2002
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with APPLIED TECH PRODUCTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jim Jeffry, Esq.

THERESA M GILLIS ESQ JONES DAY222 E 41ST STNEW YORK, NY 10017-6702UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Custom imprinting of cosmetic containers in the nature of deodorant sticks, talc shakers, powder boxes, bottles, tubes, caps and jars with decorative designs, names and directions; application of coatings to cosmetic containers in the nature of deodorant sticks, talc shakers, powder boxes, bottles, tubes, caps and jars; laminating of cosmetic containers in the nature of deodorant sticks, talc shakers, powder boxes, bottles, tubes, caps and jars; Custom manufacture of molds for use in the rubber and plastics industry; assembly of products for others, namely, cell phone battery charging stations, cell phone belt clips, radio housings, keyboard bezels, scanner mounts, printer frames, electronics cases, robotics, cases for global positioning systems, cases for portal data entry devices, inventory control units, telephones, battery charges, photodiode holders, scalpels, cosmetic compacts and mirrors, soap dispensers, and rubber, plastic, and/or metal tubes, gaskets and clamps for the automotive industry, lining caps and cosmetic casesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 19, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2009C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jul 15, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 2, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 13, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 23, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 2, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 31, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Aug 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2002R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Oct 2, 2002CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 24, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 13, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance