Drawing for APPLIED TECH PRODUCTS

USPTO serial 76058889

APPLIED TECH PRODUCTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GORMAN, MAUREEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APPLIED TECH PRODUCTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James P. Jeffry, Esq.

JAMES P JEFFRY ESQ JONES, DAY, REAVIS & POGUE599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Plastic caps, plastic closures for containers, plastic medication containers, plastic clamps, plastic boxes, plastic handles for containers, hand tools and machinery, valves of plastic being other than machine parts, display racks, shelves, display racks for the art/paint industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance