USPTO serial 76060377
BXA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BXA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle D. Kahn
FELIX MCKNIGHT IT&E GLOBAL INC228 HAMILTON AVE STE 300PALO ALTO, CA 94301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used for automating business exchange transactions in the field of electronic commerce | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |