Drawing for BXA

USPTO serial 76060468

BXA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BXA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHELLE D. KAHN

FELIX MCKNIGHT IT&E GLOBAL INC228 HAMILTON AVE STE 300PALO ALTO, CA 94301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer consulting services in the field of automated business exchange transactionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 4, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 15, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 15, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 16, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 24, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 16, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 30, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 31, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 5, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 13, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 29, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2000AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance