Drawing for DATA DIMENSIONS

USPTO serial 76060469

DATA DIMENSIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DATA DIMENSIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott Warner

SCOTT WARNER GARVEY, SCHUBERT & BAREREIGHTEENTH FL 1191 SECOND AVESEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035BUSINESS CONSULTATION IN THE NATURE OF TECHNOLOGY PROCESS RE-ENGINEERING AND TESTING; OUTSOURCING FOR OTHERS IN THE NATURE OF PROVIDING PERSONNEL FOR OPERATION AND TESTING OF COMPUTER SYSTEMSACTIVE—
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF CUSTOMIZED SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS AND ENTERPRISE-WIDE INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 5, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 14, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 27, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 16, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 15, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 11, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance