Drawing for IPNETWORK.COM

USPTO serial 76060541

IPNETWORK.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IPNETWORK.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donna C. Sobel

DONNA C SOBEL COUDERT BROTHERS1114 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-7703UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultation services via a global computer network in connection with intangible assets; referrals relating to licensing, endorsements, and appraisals of intangible assets; advertising and marketing services, namely, dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line electronic communications network in connection with intangible assets; providing business information via a global computer network in the field of marketing, licensing, and sponsorship; appraisal of intellectual property assets via a global computer network; auctioneer services via a global computer network in connection with intangible assets; promoting the goods and services of others by arranging for sponsors to affiliate their goods and services with various public activities, events and promotions; and licensing of intangible assets via a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance