USPTO serial 76060958
ELECTROLUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELECTROLUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AKTIEBOLAGET ELECTROLUX (publ.)
S-105-45 Stockholm, SE
AKTIEBOLAGET ELECTROLUX (publ.)
S-105-45 Stockholm, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George E. Hawranko
GEORGE E HAWRANKO WHITE CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIES, INC18013 CLEVELAND PKWY STE 100P O BOX 35920CLEVELAND, OH 44135Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | COMBINATION BLOWER, VACUUM SHREDDER FOR LAWN AND GARDEN CARE AND MAINTENANCE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |