USPTO serial 76061073
HAPI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HAPI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE D. MANDEL
LAWRENCE D MANDEL KLAUBER & JACKSON411 HACKENSACKHACKENSACK, NJ 07601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELEVISION APPARATUS, NAMELY TELEVISIONS, SATELLITE, TABLE AND TERRESTRIAL TELEVISION RECEIVING AND DECODING APPARATUS, NAMELY VISUAL DISPLAY UNITS, TELEVISION RECEIVERS, SATELLITE AND CABLE TELEVISION RECEIVERS, HANDHELD DEVICES, NAMELY, RADIO TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS, COMPACT DISC PLAYERS, MINI DISC PLAYERS, TELEPHONES, COMPUTER GAMES CONSOLES AND PALM TOP COMPUTERS FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING DATA VIA RADIO FREQUENCY, CABLE, SATELLITE AND THE INTERNET; TELEPHONES, VIDEOPHONES, MODEMS, COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER PERIPHERALS THEREFOR, NAMELY PRINTERS, SCANNERS, FACSIMILE RECEIVERS AND TRANSMITTERS, VIDEO MONITORS AND COMPUTER DISC DRIVES; BARCODE READERS, OPTICAL SCANNERS AND SET TOP BOXES FOR THE RECEIVING AND DECODING OF DATA; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE RECEIVING AND DECODING OF DATA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |