USPTO serial 76061082
SEDONA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEDONA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Helen H. Minskcr
HELEN H MINSKCR BANNER & WHITCOFF1001 G ST NWELEVENTH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4597Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | WEARING APPAREL FOR MEN AND WOMEN NAMELY; T-SHIRTS; SWEATSHIRTS, SHIRTS OF ALL KINDS; SWEAT PANTS, SWEAT SUITS; TRACK SUITS, SKI SUITS, SKI JACKETS, SKI PANTS, BATHING SUITS, SHORTS, VESTS, SWEATERS, PANTS, COATS, JACKETS, GLOVES, WRISTBANDS, LEG WARMERS, TIES, BELTS; SUSPENDERS; HEADWEAR NAMELY, HATS, CAPS, VISORS, EAR MUFFS, HEAD BANDS; BAGS NAMELY, HANDBAGS, SPORTS BAGS, COOLER BAGS, SHOULDER BAGS; TOWELS AND APRONS; DRINKING GLASSES; PLASTIC CUPS; PLAYING CARDS; PENS; SIGNS; BANNERS; POSTERS; KEY CHAINS; BOTTLE OPENERS; BUCKETS; TAP HANDLES; COASTERS; MIRRORS; CLOCKS; WATCHES; ORNAMENTAL PINS; SUNGLASSES; LIGHTERS, AND UMBRELLAS | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Alcoholic brewery beverages, namely, beer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |