USPTO serial 76061108
CONSILIENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONSILIENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KUNI OH
KUNI OH JACKSON & CO LLP6114 LA SALE AVE #507OAKLAND, CA 94611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, NETWORK-BASED PLATFORMS THAT AUTOMATE COMPLEX, MULTI-ENTITY BUSINESS PROCESSES BY INTEGRATING MULTIPLE SYSTEMS AND DATA SOURCES INTO A RICH COLLABORATIVE APPLICATION ENVIRONMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | BUSINESS AND TECHNICAL CONSULTING AND SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF NETWORK-BASED PLATFORMS THAT AUTOMATE COMPLEX, MULTI-ENTITY BUSINESS PROCESSES BY INTEGRATING MULTIPLE SYSTEMS AND DATA SOURCES INTO A RICH COLLABORATIVE APPLICATION ENVIRONMENT VIA TELEPHONE, EMAIL, THE INTERNET AND IN PERSON | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |