USPTO serial 76061799
TEAMTIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEAMTIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Apolzpn, Esq.
LAWRENCE E APOLZON ESQ FROSS, ZELNICK, LEHRMAN & ZISSU866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROMOTING GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS IN THE FIELDS OF SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT VIA THE INTERNET, TELEPHONE AND OTHER MEDIA SERVICES, NAMELY, RADIO, TELEVISION, BROCHURES, GIFTS, DIRECT MAIL, POINT OF SALE COUPONS AND MEDIA COUPONS; PROVIDING RETAIL STORE SERVICES FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELDS OF SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT VIA TELEPHONE AND OTHER MEDIA SERVICES, NAMELY, RADIO, TELEVISION, BROCHURES, GIFTS, DIRECT MAIL, POINT OF SALE COUPONS AND MAGAZINE COUPONS; INCENTIVE AWARD PROGRAMS TO PROMOTE THE SALE OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ARRANGING FOR TICKET RESERVATIONS FOR SPORTS AND COMPETITIONS AND ENTERTAINMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |