USPTO serial 76062321
PLANTFIND.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHOSHO II, ERNEST
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLANTFIND.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Boynton Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Cyril Malloy
JOHN CYRIL MALLOY HISTORIC CORAL WAYMALLOY & MALLOY, PA2800 S W THIRD AVEMIAMI, FL 33129Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software design services for others featuring e-commerce software to allow wholesale and retail users in the green industry (horticultural, agricultural, and floricultural) to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; printed material, namely newsletters and flyers, featuring news, events, and information in the field of the green industries (horticultural, agricultural, and floricultural) directed to the wholesale and retail communities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |