USPTO serial 76062462
DANGER RANGERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- OFFICE OF THE TRADEMARK COMMISSIONER
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DANGER RANGERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CHARLOTTE, NC
Knoxville, TN
Knoxville, TN
CHARLOTTE, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. McWilliams
LOUIS M HEIDELBERGER REED SMITH LLP2500 ONE LIBERTY PL 1650 MARKET ST UPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toys, namely stuffed animals, action figures and board games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EDUCATIONAL ADVENTURES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Primal Combat Science, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Primal Combat Science, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PERSONAL & CHILD SAFETY, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named DANGER RANGERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |