USPTO serial 76062556
KLIK-N-PAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KLIK-N-PAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Orangeburg, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ralph J. Mancini
RALPH J MANCINI16 ROUND HILL DRDANBURY, CT 06811UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | ELECTRONIC PAYMENT, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION OF REAL ESTATE RENT PAYMENTS ENABLING MEMBER SUBSCRIBERS TO COLLECT RENT PAYMENTS USING CREDIT CARD AND DIRECT DEBIT BILLING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |