USPTO serial 76062688
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Cypher
JAMES R CYPHER1607 FINANCIAL CTR BLDG405 - 14TH STOAKLAND, CA 94612| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | modular component of the KeyBuild computer software suite provided on CD ROMs, diskettes, or downloaded via online connection for use by wall panel manufacturers or builders to generate materials lists and construction drawings of steel or wood wall panel components | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |