USPTO serial 76062828
RENTERS REQUEST PROPERTIES RESPOND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINYK, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RENTERS REQUEST PROPERTIES RESPOND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morland C. Fischer
MORLAND C FISCHER2030 MAIN ST STE 1050IRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing text and photographic information over a global computer network concerning the availability, price, location and description of residential real property to prospective renters according to their needs and qualifications; communicating lease offers and negotiations between lessors and prospective renters of residential real property over a global computer network; and making rent payments for renters to lessors of residential real property and providing such renters with incentives through an awards program offered over a global computer network | ACTIVE | Apr 26, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |