USPTO serial 76063113
VINGA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EPPS, TONYE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VINGA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. LEONARD GROVE
A LEONARD GROVE CANADA, M4W 3J5RICHES, MCKENZIE & HERBERTSTE 2900, 2 BLOOR ST ETORONTO, ON M4W 3J5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | canned beans, dry beans, namely, lentils, navy beans, red kidney beans, romano beans, yellow split peas, white kidney beans, medium lupini beans; frozen vegetables, namely, whole kernel corn, mixed vegetables, green peas, fava beans, green beans, lima beans; frozen fish, namely, cod fillets, sole fillets, turbot fillets, whiting fillets, black scabbard fish, horse mackerel, white stickleback, octopus, whiting, blue stickleback, sardines, red fish, small mackerel; olives, olive oil; pumpkin seeds; roasted nuts, namely, toasted corn, deep fried fava beans | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | flour, namely, white corn meal, yellow corn meal, yellow corn flour, mandioca flour; rice, namely, parboiled rice, Italian rice; candies, namely, sugar almonds; wine vinegar; condiments, namely, sweet pimento paste, hot pimento paste | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |